Friday, 26 December 2008
Merry Christmas everyone! team blog
I hope you're having a happy and peaceful time wherever you are and may the best of 2008 be the worst that 2009 brings to you.
Love and hugs from Lily x Read more!
Wednesday, 17 December 2008
donesville
ok. i am terribly sorry that it took me so long to read tractors.
but i finished last night and it was wonderful!
is everyone done?
I am. Do you fancy getting the ball rolling, Cornbread, as I think I remember your saying you had a review more or less worked out? Next week might be a good time, it would give Stitchwhiz a chance to catch up. (Lily)
but i finished last night and it was wonderful!
is everyone done?
I am. Do you fancy getting the ball rolling, Cornbread, as I think I remember your saying you had a review more or less worked out? Next week might be a good time, it would give Stitchwhiz a chance to catch up. (Lily)
i got nothin'. (cornbread)
Read more!
Saturday, 13 December 2008
EUREKA! team post
Did you know that as a team member, you can not only create your own posts for the blog, but you can add to existing ones posted by other members?
This means that once the first review is posted, we can all add to that post and our thoughts will be immediately visible on the blog, instead of having to check the comments window all the time. It would look and feel more like a conversation. (We'd have to add our names before/after our contributions so we could tell who said what.)
i shall call this post a practise team-practice. (cornbread)
There you go! (Lily) Read more!
This means that once the first review is posted, we can all add to that post and our thoughts will be immediately visible on the blog, instead of having to check the comments window all the time. It would look and feel more like a conversation. (We'd have to add our names before/after our contributions so we could tell who said what.)
Of course I'm not advocating tinkering with any old post, just the ones that invite co-authors. We could add 'team post' or something similar to our post titles to indicate that we'd like others to join in. What do you think guys? Practise on this one!
OOPS Cornbread has just pointed out that he can only alter his own posts. My fault - I'd forgotten to give team members administrative privileges. Have ticked the right boxes now (hopefully!) so please try again.
OOPS Cornbread has just pointed out that he can only alter his own posts. My fault - I'd forgotten to give team members administrative privileges. Have ticked the right boxes now (hopefully!) so please try again.
i shall call this post a practise team-practice. (cornbread)
There you go! (Lily) Read more!
virtual book review
have virtual book review bubbling up in brain, but will wait for the lovely josephine to finish partying and post something.
Read more!
Wednesday, 10 December 2008
is it ok if i do this, ms. lily?
hello. cornbread here. no spoilers are included and no animals were harmed in any way in the making of this post. it's more of a vocabulary thing.
Read more!
when i read a book i make marks and notes in it. ((gasp))
pen, pencil, whatever's handy. sometimes it's just a favorite turn of phrase or line, or something i "think" might be a foreshadowing of things to come. (i'm usually wrong.) sometimes it's whole paragraphs that have a certain appeal. sometimes it's a word i either don't know or question if i know the meaning of.
this post is a list of words i came across while reading "tractors." quite a few are apparently common to the british vernacular. or maybe not. several are easy enough to get from context, but i've included them as well, along with web references and some pictures for your viewing pleasure...
like this one of secateurs (page 46 in my copy)
are you only seeing the "superior breasts"? well look again. the man is holding a pair of pruning shears. is secateurs common nomenclature in europe? i've never heard it before. but what do i know?
on with the vocabulary list...
in "tractors", much to her sister's chagrin, nadia was partial to oxfam. (yeah, yeah, but i never heard of it before. and i bet josephine hasn't either.) maybe lily can show us which shop nadia most likely frequented. and while she's at it, show us where peterborough and selby are. (if i've done my sleuthing right, i think lily lives somewhere between the two.)
hrivna = about 20 cents american? i wonder if the dollar hasn't "fallen through the floor" (p. 33) further by today.
panopticon (p.150) i love this word. never heard or read it before that i remember. it's kinda like "big brother", huh?
and in more modern parlance, how 'bout this "little brother" use of the word? cool.
GCE (p.154) from context, i assume it's the 1st one in that list of acronyms.
primigravida (p.184)
louche-looking (p.196)
sic transit gloria mundi (p.246)
(SIK TRAN-sit GLAWR-ee-uh MOON-dee) Latin for “Thus passes away the glory of the world”; worldly things do not last.
here's a poem of the same name by the esteemed ms. emily dickinson.
there are too many cool images here for me to choose just one, but somewhere in there is a photo of an ice berg.
sick (sic) transit gloria mundi, indeed...
perspicacious (p.267) no matter how many times i look this word up i never seem to remember what it means. is that a tad ironic?
DIY (pp. unknown) DIY is just stupid...this must be another english thing. clearly it means, "do it yourself," but who says that??! "DIY"?
ok. i give. apparently lots of people do. a google search for DIY shows 121,000,000! results.
even how to kiss.
for god's sake, you idiots, DIY!!!!
(i'm sure these diy projects will change by the time you read this, but when i looked at it there really were instructions on how to kiss, but i was laughing too hard to read them. drat!)
so that's it for now, kiddies. i'm sorry if i broke any book club rules by posting without permission. and even sorrier if you already knew all there was to know about these (to me) relative obscurities.
p.s. i am not about to proofread this long-ass post, so just tough it out. and happy reading...
Tuesday, 9 December 2008
Sunday, 7 December 2008
Tuesday, 2 December 2008
Da rules
Ok, listen up, Cornbread has fessed up to premature evaluation and has one chapter already under his belt. So to stop the rest of you falling behind, I'm setting down some rules:
Read more!
- If you've got the book, start reading but keep schtum until you've finished it.
- Then leave a short post to let club members know you're done .
- When everyone's finished the book, we'll start discussing it.
Almost there
- Three of us have acquired copies of Tractors. Would it be rude to make a start or should we wait for our fourth esteemed member? I don't mind either way.
- I think book clubs work by everyone reading the whole book then getting together to discuss it. Of course we could make our own rules up - how about posting your ideas on how we could run ours, eg check in chapter by chapter/set a few dates to meet online and discuss however much we've read by then?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)